[sles-beta] SLES11-SP3 RC1 question concerning zypper dist-upgrade when upgrading from SLES11-SP2, why additional 32bit libraries on a x86_64 bit server?
urs.frey at post.ch
urs.frey at post.ch
Wed May 1 09:48:12 MDT 2013
Ok thanks for double check
Urs Frey
Die Schweizerische Post
Services
Informationstechnologie
Webergutstrasse 12
3030 Bern (Zollikofen)
Telefon : ++41 (0)58 338 58 70
FAX : ++41 (0)58 667 30 07
E-Mail: urs.frey at post.ch
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: sles-beta-bounces at lists.suse.com [mailto:sles-beta-bounces at lists.suse.com] Im Auftrag von Thorsten Kukuk
Gesendet: Wednesday, May 01, 2013 5:46 PM
An: SUSE Linux Enterprise Server Authorized Beta Program
Betreff: Re: [sles-beta] SLES11-SP3 RC1 question concerning zypper dist-upgrade when upgrading from SLES11-SP2, why additional 32bit libraries on a x86_64 bit server?
Hi,
On Wed, May 01, urs.frey at post.ch wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am doing SLES11-SP3 upgrade testing from SLES11-SP2 x86_64 to SLES11-SP3 RC1 x86_64
> I installed SLES11-SP2 base pattern, to latest patch-update
>
> When invoking zipper dist-upgrade, I can see that some new packages get installed. So far OK.
> What worries me, that there are new libraries-32 being installed.
> I mean, when having a pure x86_64 SLES11-SP2 64bit installation, why get 32bit libraries newly installed?
But you didn't had a pure x86_64 installation, as your zypper
output shows. So it is expected that the new gcc runtime dependencies
are fullfilled.
Thorsten
--
Thorsten Kukuk, Project Manager/Release Manager SLES
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
_______________________________________________
sles-beta mailing list
sles-beta at lists.suse.com
http://lists.suse.com/mailman/listinfo/sles-beta
More information about the sles-beta
mailing list