From Dick.Waite at softwareag.com Wed Sep 9 01:41:36 2015 From: Dick.Waite at softwareag.com (Waite, Dick (External)) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 07:41:36 +0000 Subject: [sles-beta] SLES 12 SP1 Beta3 - LVM Issues SR 10968311721 In-Reply-To: <20150904122658.GA4120@suse.de> References: <46AC8C81C10B8C48820201DF2AE1D76DF0B9F51A@hqmbx6.eur.ad.sag> <20150904122658.GA4120@suse.de> Message-ID: <46AC8C81C10B8C48820201DF2AE1D76DF0BA806E@hqmbx6.eur.ad.sag> Grand New Wednesday, September 09, 2015 Still pushing on my Beta3 issue. I created a new machine. It had a LVM with ext4's. I resized the /home and then I'm told I have no "/" any more. This is not right. One can resize and add logical partitions on a new install or has the old brain given up. I do not create new machines very often but I do think I can resize /home or ? I did try this with a SLES12-SP0 and it did work as expected, attached some screenshots. Something is smelling in Beta3 in the LVM area. Could be VMware related sure but one gets issues right at the start. __R -----Original Message----- From: sles-beta-bounces at lists.suse.com [mailto:sles-beta-bounces at lists.suse.com] On Behalf Of Thorsten Kukuk Sent: Freitag, 4. September 2015 14:27 To: sles-beta at lists.suse.com Subject: Re: [sles-beta] SLES 12 SP1 Beta3 - LVM Issues SR 10968311721 Hi, On Fri, Sep 04, Waite, Dick (External) wrote: > Using Beta3 I checked my machine that has issues with LVM on Beta2, the issues are still there. I have updated the SR and attached a journelctl log. It seems to be in the UUDI area of a mount. If I go back to Beta1 the machine runs grand, as it did with SLES12-SP0. While I got easily reproduce the LVM problem on Beta2, I'm no longer able to do so with Beta3. For me, LVM is working fine again. Something is special on your LVM setup. Thorsten -- Thorsten Kukuk, Senior Architect SLES & Common Code Base SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany GF: Felix Imend?rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG N?rnberg) _______________________________________________ sles-beta mailing list sles-beta at lists.suse.com http://lists.suse.com/mailman/listinfo/sles-beta Software AG ? Sitz/Registered office: Uhlandstra?e 12, 64297 Darmstadt, Germany ? Registergericht/Commercial register: Darmstadt HRB 1562 - Vorstand/Management Board: Karl-Heinz Streibich (Vorsitzender/Chairman), Eric Duffaut, Dr. Wolfram Jost, Arnd Zinnhardt; - Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender/Chairman of the Supervisory Board: Dr. Andreas Bereczky - http://www.softwareag.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: SLES12-SP1-Beta3_2015-09-09.zip Type: application/x-zip-compressed Size: 290637 bytes Desc: SLES12-SP1-Beta3_2015-09-09.zip URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: SLES12-SP0-GA_2015-09-09.zip Type: application/x-zip-compressed Size: 326142 bytes Desc: SLES12-SP0-GA_2015-09-09.zip URL: From vmoutoussamy at suse.com Wed Sep 9 08:14:16 2015 From: vmoutoussamy at suse.com (Vincent Moutoussamy) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 16:14:16 +0200 Subject: [sles-beta] Registration code for sles12-beta2 In-Reply-To: <55E4893F02000022001ACD84@smtp.nue.novell.com> References: <55E4893F02000022001ACD84@smtp.nue.novell.com> Message-ID: Hi, Gary, do you still have an issue when registering your SLES 12 SP1 beta to SCC ? As a reminder, please contact us directly at beta-programs at lists.suse.com for this kind of logistic issues (access to iso, mailing lists, reg code issues, etc). We can then investigate and decide if it need to be treated as a Service Request or not. Have a nice day, Regards, -- Vincent Moutoussamy SUSE Beta Program and SDK Project Manager > On 31 Aug 2015, at 17:05, Simona Arsene wrote: > > Gary, > > could you open a Service Request and include the > a. Product you tried to activate > b. The registration code(s) used? > > Your production registration code will not work for beta program, > you need to use the special keys that we made available. > > Thank you in advance, > Simona > > >>>> On 8/31/2015 at 4:49 PM, in message > , Gary > Ernst wrote: >> Anyone else having problems registering beta 2 ? >> I've tried both our production code as well as the beta code from beta 1 >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Gary Ernst >> Managed Services: System Engineer >> MainLine Information Systems >> Office: 727-376-6807 >> Email Gary.Ernst at mainline.com >> >> This e-mail and files transmitted with it are confidential, and are intended >> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is >> addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent >> responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified >> that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is >> strictly prohibited. If you are not one of the named recipient(s) or >> otherwise have reason to believe that you received this message in error, >> please immediately notify sender by e-mail, and destroy the original message. >> Thank You. > > > > _______________________________________________ > sles-beta mailing list > sles-beta at lists.suse.com > http://lists.suse.com/mailman/listinfo/sles-beta From vmoutoussamy at suse.com Thu Sep 10 07:31:01 2015 From: vmoutoussamy at suse.com (Vincent Moutoussamy) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 15:31:01 +0200 Subject: [sles-beta] SLES 12 SP1 BETA2 - Update from path .. In-Reply-To: <55DD9169.4090506@uis.cam.ac.uk> References: <46AC8C81C10B8C48820201DF2AE1D76DF0B80BED@hqmbx6.eur.ad.sag> <20150826073854.GA6049@suse.de> <55DD9169.4090506@uis.cam.ac.uk> Message-ID: Hi, > On 26 Aug 2015, at 12:14, Simon Flood wrote: > > On 26/08/2015 08:38, Thorsten Kukuk wrote: > >> Insert your DVD, boot, select upgrade. > > Is it supported to go from SLES11 SP3 to SLES12 SP1? If it's like previous releases I expect the supported route is to first upgrade to SLES11 SP4. yes, this is new ! It will be supported to upgrade a SLES 11 SP3 to SLES 12 SP1 and of course SLES 11 SP4 to SLES 12 SP1. We hope to give you some information about this in the near future, so stay tuned ! > > Are there some beta docs that we can have access to? Are you looking for something special ? Do not hesitate to give your thought or feedback to beta-programs at lists.suse.com. > > Thanks, > Simon -- Vincent Moutoussamy SUSE Beta Program and SDK Project Manager From kukuk at suse.de Thu Sep 10 15:54:17 2015 From: kukuk at suse.de (Thorsten Kukuk) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 23:54:17 +0200 Subject: [sles-beta] Runlevel returning incorrect results from within a bash script. In-Reply-To: <8DF83C4E147F0A4E8200107B29A520EC84326C@prvxmb01.microfocus.com> References: <8DF83C4E147F0A4E8200107B29A520EC84326C@prvxmb01.microfocus.com> Message-ID: <20150910215417.GA11065@suse.de> Hi, On Thu, Sep 10, Craig Salmond wrote: > Has anyone seen this? > > I am running runlevel from a subprocess of a bash script: > > local tmp=$( /sbin/runlevel ) > echo "${tmp}" > output from echo: > N / > > The output should be: > > N 5 After adjusting your code to run standalone, it works correct for me. But since your code are only two lines of your shell script and never the code to reproduce, the bug is mostlikly in the rest of your code. Thorsten -- Thorsten Kukuk, Senior Architect SLES & Common Code Base SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany GF: Felix Imend?rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG N?rnberg) From srd-csi-zack at foxconn.com Thu Sep 10 23:43:18 2015 From: srd-csi-zack at foxconn.com (srd-csi-zack at foxconn.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 13:43:18 +0800 Subject: [sles-beta] Fail to install 32-bit paravirtualized XEN VM on SLES12SP1_Beta3 Message-ID:
Hello,
 
Install SLES12SP1_Beta3 with XEN package selected. Boot into OS with XEN kernel to install VM. There's no problem to install 64-bit VM (try with SLES11SP4). But when installing 32-bit VM, VM would hang during kernel files loading. Attach screenshot for hanging.
 
 
Try more,
 
1. When using RHEL6.5 for VM OS, get the same situation.
2. SLES12SP1_Beta2 is the same too.
 
 
Thanks.
 
Zack.
 
 

mail from ip-->10.67.19.54
mail from pc-->TJCABGSRD-0277
Version: Super Notes 1.6.5.9B

-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/octet-stream Size: 214749 bytes Desc: not available URL: