[Deepsea-users] OBS project
Jan Fajerski
jfajerski at suse.com
Fri Nov 24 02:00:18 MST 2017
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 09:46:12AM +0100, Nathan Cutler wrote:
>>>Since Factory/Tumbleweed is supposed to be more-or-less on the
>>>cutting edge, I would like to migrate filesystems:ceph/ceph to the
>>>new Mimic build ASAP. Will this have any adverse effect on the
>>>DeepSea build in filesystems:ceph/deepsea?
>>For the build: no I don't think so. Though I guess installation from
>>that one project won't work anymore?
>
>Right. This change will cause problems for anyone who might be relying
>on filesystems:ceph containing RPMs built from the "stable" branch of
>deepsea (I think it's called "SES5") together with corresponding ceph
>RPMs. After I make this change, the ceph build in filesystems:ceph
>will be intended to work with deepsea RPMs built from the master
>branch.
Right. DeepSea's SES5 branch should move to filesystems:ceph:luminous of course.
I'll bring this up in next weeks standup. Until then I think the SES5 branch
should work reasonably with the current ceph devel project.
>
>>Wasn't the approach so far that filesystems:ceph mirrored the
>>current latest version (now to be filesystems:ceph:mimic)? Is this
>>going to change now?
>
>That has always been the approach, since filesystems:ceph is the devel
>project for Factory/Tumbleweed.
>
>Nathan
>_______________________________________________
>Deepsea-users mailing list
>Deepsea-users at lists.suse.com
>http://lists.suse.com/mailman/listinfo/deepsea-users
--
Jan Fajerski
Engineer Enterprise Storage
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton,
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
More information about the Deepsea-users
mailing list