[sle-beta] assert in dmi_check_system
Vincent Moutoussamy
vmoutoussamy at suse.com
Wed Aug 29 02:28:20 MDT 2018
Hi,
Could you please create a bug report for this issue?
Here is the direct link to do so:
https://bugzilla.suse.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Beta%20SUSE%20Linux%20Enterprise%20Server%2012%20SP4 <https://bugzilla.suse.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Beta%20SUSE%20Linux%20Enterprise%20Server%2012%20SP4>
Thank you,
Regards,
--
Vincent Moutoussamy
SUSE Beta Program, JeOS and SDK Project Manager
> On 29 Aug 2018, at 09:03, tiantao (H) <tiantao6 at huawei.com> wrote:
>
>
> HI :
>
> I found a bug on Hi1616. Using beta3 on sles12sp4
>
> The system will encounter the following warning when it start up on beta3.but the system will boot ok using the sle12sp3 or sle15 on same platform
>
>
> [ 0.000986] dmi check: not initialized yet.
> [ 0.001000] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 0.001011] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at ../drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c:832 dmi_check_system+0x8c/0x94
> [ 0.001012] Modules linked in:
> [ 0.001015] Supported: Yes
> [ 0.001018] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.12.14-94.33-default #1 SLE12-SP4
> [ 0.001019] Hardware name: (null) (DT)
> [ 0.001021] task: ffff000008e22980 task.stack: ffff000008e10000
> [ 0.001023] PC is at dmi_check_system+0x8c/0x94
> [ 0.001025] LR is at dmi_check_system+0x8c/0x94
> [ 0.001027] pc : [<ffff00000872ba88>] lr : [<ffff00000872ba88>] pstate: 60000005
> [ 0.001028] sp : ffff000008e13f70
> [ 0.001030] x29: ffff000008e13f70 x28: 0000000000c80018
> [ 0.001033] x27: 000000000000015a x26: 000000003ed67828
> [ 0.001036] x25: 0000000000000000 x24: ffff80affbfffd00
> [ 0.001039] x23: ffff000008e19000 x22: ffff000008f7a000
> [ 0.001042] x21: ffff000008d3f828 x20: ffff000008f7a000
> [ 0.001045] x19: ffff000008d4a0f8 x18: 000000000000000b
> [ 0.001048] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000
> [ 0.001051] x15: ffffffffffffffff x14: 662072656d697420
> [ 0.001054] x13: 676e697375206465 x12: 0000000000000000
> [ 0.001057] x11: 00000000000000fc x10: 0000000000000004
> [ 0.001060] x9 : 00000000000000fd x8 : ffff000008e1a488
> [ 0.001063] x7 : ffff0000085fb018 x6 : ffff000008fd493e
> [ 0.001065] x5 : ffff801ffbe38e00 x4 : 0000000000000000
> [ 0.001068] x3 : 0000000000000001 x2 : ffffffffffffffff
> [ 0.001071] x1 : ffff000008e42338 x0 : 000000000000001f
> [ 0.001075] Call trace:
> [ 0.001077] Exception stack(0xffff000008e13e30 to 0xffff000008e13f70)
> [ 0.001079] 3e20: 000000000000001f ffff000008e42338
> [ 0.001081] 3e40: ffffffffffffffff 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 ffff801ffbe38e00
> [ 0.001083] 3e60: ffff000008fd493e ffff0000085fb018 ffff000008e1a488 00000000000000fd
> [ 0.001084] 3e80: 0000000000000004 00000000000000fc 0000000000000000 676e697375206465
> [ 0.001086] 3ea0: 662072656d697420 ffffffffffffffff 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> [ 0.001087] 3ec0: 000000000000000b ffff000008d4a0f8 ffff000008f7a000 ffff000008d3f828
> [ 0.001089] 3ee0: ffff000008f7a000 ffff000008e19000 ffff80affbfffd00 0000000000000000
> [ 0.001091] 3f00: 000000003ed67828 000000000000015a 0000000000c80018 ffff000008e13f70
> [ 0.001092] 3f20: ffff00000872ba88 ffff000008e13f70 ffff00000872ba88 0000000060000005
> [ 0.001094] 3f40: ffff00000987c000 0000000000000001 ffffffffffffffff ffff801ffbe38e00
> [ 0.001095] 3f60: ffff000008e13f70 ffff00000872ba88
> [ 0.001098] [<ffff00000872ba88>] dmi_check_system+0x8c/0x94
> [ 0.001102] [<ffff000008cc78f4>] acpi_early_init+0x58/0xd8
> [ 0.001104] [<ffff000008c80d54>] start_kernel+0x38c/0x3fc
> [ 0.001108] ---[ end trace f68728a0d3053b52 ]---
> [ 0.004534] ACPI: 1 ACPI AML tables successfully acquired and loaded
>
>
> As you can see from the code below,the above callstack is because the dmi_initialized is not assigned a value of 1.
>
> 827 int dmi_check_system(const struct dmi_system_id *list)
> 828 {
> 829 int count = 0;
> 830 const struct dmi_system_id *d;
> 831
> 832 WARN(!dmi_initialized, KERN_ERR "dmi check: not initialized yet.\n");
> 833
> 834 for (d = list; !dmi_is_end_of_table(d); d++)
> 835 if (dmi_matches(d)) {
> 836 count++;
> 837 if (d->callback && d->callback(d))
> 838 break;
> 839 }
> 840
> 841 return count;
> 842 }
>
> but the dmi_initialized will be assigned the value of 1 in dmi_scan_machine function under any condition . I notice the dmi_scan_machine is different from the latest kernel.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Best Regards,
>
> tiantao6 at huawei.com <mailto:tiantao6 at huawei.com>
> Turing Architecture and Design Dept, Hisilicon
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 本邮件及其附件含有华为公司的保密信息，仅限于发送给上面地址中列出的个人或群组。禁止任何其他人以任何形式使用（包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、或散发）本邮件中的信息。如果您错收了本邮件，请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本邮件！
> This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it!
>
> _______________________________________________
> sle-beta mailing list
> sle-beta at lists.suse.com <mailto:sle-beta at lists.suse.com>
> http://lists.suse.com/mailman/listinfo/sle-beta <http://lists.suse.com/mailman/listinfo/sle-beta>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.suse.com/pipermail/sle-beta/attachments/20180829/788be97f/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.suse.com/pipermail/sle-beta/attachments/20180829/788be97f/attachment.sig>
More information about the sle-beta
mailing list